织梦CMS - 轻松建站从此开始!

abg欧博官网|登陆|游戏|

What's the difference between continuous and

时间:2025-11-28 14:58来源: 作者:admin 点击: 5 次
$\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}$The notion of piecewise continuity (PWC) is used differently in different contexts. a Often, a function $f:\R\to\R$ is c

$\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}$The notion of piecewise continuity (PWC) is used differently in different contexts. a Often, a function $f:\R\to\R$ is called PWC if it continuous everywhere, but at a finite number of points.

In the context of Laplace transform and other integral transforms, a function $f$ is said to be PWC if it is continuous on a partition of intervals of its domain and at the boundaries of the intervals the function has well-defined and finite limits.

Definition. [PWC] A function $f:[a,b]\to\R$ is called piecewise continuous (PWC) if there exist $a = x_0 < x_1 < \ldots < x_n = b$ so that

$f$ is continuous on $(x_k, x_{k+1})$ for all $k=0,\ldots, n-1$

The limits $\lim_{x\to{}x_{k+1}^{-}}f(x)$ and $\lim_{x\to{}x_{k}^{+}}f(x)$ exist and are finite for all $k=0,\ldots, n-1$

According to this definition, function $$ f(x) = \begin{cases} 0, &\text{ for } x = 0 \\ \frac{1}{x}, &\text{ for } x{}>{}0 \end{cases} $$ defined over $[0, \infty)$, is not PWC according to the second definition although it has only one point of discontinuity.

Additionally, function $f(x)=\tfrac{1}{x}$, $x\in\R\setminus\{0\}$, is not PWC, again because the limits $\lim_{x\to 0^+}f(x)$ and $\lim_{x\to 0^-}f(x)$ are not finite.

(责任编辑:)
------分隔线----------------------------
发表评论
请自觉遵守互联网相关的政策法规,严禁发布色情、暴力、反动的言论。
评价:
表情:
用户名: 验证码:
发布者资料
查看详细资料 发送留言 加为好友 用户等级: 注册时间:2025-12-14 22:12 最后登录:2025-12-14 22:12
栏目列表
推荐内容